Menu
FOS Change of Address

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is ‘moving house’.

FOS’s main office at South Quay, East London, where they’ve been for 15 years, is soon to be demolished to make way for a 73 storey tower dubbed “the Toothpick”.

FOS’s new registered address is:

Financial Ombudsman Service
Exchange Tower
London 
E14 9SR.

Post sent to the old address will continue to be forwarded to the new address for the foreseeable future. Phone numbers and email addresses remain unchanged.

The FOS consumer leaflet which must be sent with all complaint final outcome letters (more information here) has been updated.

Read more about FOS’s house move here.

 

Don’t forget to check Our View about this article and the Actions Required By You

FOS Change of Address

Important Note: ATEB news is intended to provide general information ONLY. The content, including any views expressed or guidance provided, does not replace the need to comply fully with FCA Rules and Guidance. Unless you have discussed news article content with ATEB, and specifically how it relates to your circumstances, then ATEB disclaims all liability and responsibility and actions arising from any reliance placed upon it. For the avoidance of doubt therefore, any reliance you place on such information without our consultation is at your own risk.

ATEB Compliance offers compliance and regulatory advice.

ATEB Suitability provides report writing software for the financial services market.

Our View

Information only

Action Required By You

  • Update disclosure documentation, initial disclosure documents, terms of business, etc with the new address;
  • There is no need to throw away consumer leaflets for the time being, so old stock can be used up, although you should order new leaflets within what FOS describe as ‘a sensible period of time’.
SUIT - Beautiful Reports
CREATE BEAUTIFUL
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
TRY IT FOR FREE
SUIT - Complete Control
TAKE BACK
CONTROL OF YOUR
SUITABILITY REPORT
PRODUCTION
TRY IT FOR FREE
SUIT - Comp confidence
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
WITH FULL
COMPLIANCE
CONFIDENCE
TRY IT FOR FREE
previous arrow
next arrow

About the Author

Contact Us

Brought to you by

Explore more articles in this category

Other articles that you might be interested in

White caution cone on keyboard

Conduct Rules Breaches – follow up

Compliance , , , ,

We wrote recently about the Conduct Rules and, in particular, breaches and notifications . See here. This article is intended to clarify some of the grey around COCON breaches. All of the following is taken from Policy Statement PS 18-14. When is disciplinary action required? When and how a firm decides to undertake disciplinary action […]

Read More
pensions regulator

New anti-scam rules for scheme trustees

Compliance , , , , , , , ,

The rights of pension scheme members to transfer, that were established in the Pensions Act 2015 are no longer absolute from 30 November 2021.   From that date, in an attempt to identify potential scams and prevent members becoming victims, trustees and scheme managers must ensure specific checks are made before complying with a member’s […]

Read More
Man people woman street

Government Scrap Protected Pension Age Window

Compliance , , , , , , ,

We previously issued a newsletter in February 2021, outlining government proposals to increase the Normal Minimum Pension Age (NMPA) from 55 to 57, with the change due to come into effect from 6 April 2028. This means that from April 2028, the earliest a member of a pension scheme will be able to access their […]

Read More
Expectations

Another Pension Transfer Charging Quirk

Compliance , , ,

Policy Statement PS20-06 states: “A firm may set a different level of non-contingent charges if they are not undertaking the full range of advising and related services that are normally provided alongside DB transfer advice. For example, if a firm is not advising on the proposed destination for the funds, it could offer lower charges […]

Read More
Different kind of hats on display

Appointed Representatives – some SM&CR questions

Compliance , , , , , , ,

Occasionally, we come across firms that are ‘Principal Firms’ – i.e. the firm has Appointed Representatives (AR) but where one or more individuals straddle both the Principal and the AR. This can raise questions around the applicability of SM&CR to such individuals since the SM&CR does not apply to ARs. Why does the SM&CR not […]

Read More
Load More