Menu
Reporting complaints upheld against an adviser

Firms are reminded of the requirement to notify the FCA in either of the following situations.

  • in any 12 month period, three complaints are upheld* against any individual adviser
    … notification must be made within 20 business days starting on the day
        on which the third complaint was upheld;
  • if a complaint is upheld* against any individual adviser, where the redress paid exceeds £50,000
    … notification must be made within 20 business days starting on the day
        on which the complaint was upheld.

 

The relevant rule is SUP 15.12.

Don’t forget to check Our View about this article and the Actions Required By You

Reporting complaints upheld against an adviser

Important Note: ATEB news is intended to provide general information ONLY. The content, including any views expressed or guidance provided, does not replace the need to comply fully with FCA Rules and Guidance. Unless you have discussed news article content with ATEB, and specifically how it relates to your circumstances, then ATEB disclaims all liability and responsibility and actions arising from any reliance placed upon it. For the avoidance of doubt therefore, any reliance you place on such information without our consultation is at your own risk.

ATEB Compliance offers compliance and regulatory advice.

ATEB Suitability provides report writing software for the financial services market.

Our View

* Note that, although the rule implies that it is complaints which the firm has upheld that count for this purpose, those upheld by the FOS, regardless, of the firm’s final decision, are also counted.

This has been clarified directly with the FCA.

 

Action Required By You

For information only.

SUIT - Beautiful Reports
CREATE BEAUTIFUL
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
TRY IT FOR FREE
SUIT - Complete Control
TAKE BACK
CONTROL OF YOUR
SUITABILITY REPORT
PRODUCTION
TRY IT FOR FREE
SUIT - Comp confidence
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
WITH FULL
COMPLIANCE
CONFIDENCE
TRY IT FOR FREE
previous arrow
next arrow

About the Author

Contact Us

Brought to you by

Explore more articles in this category

Other articles that you might be interested in

hmrc

Bed and ISA – not so straightforward anymore?

Compliance , ,

Benjamin Franklin once said: “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes”. You could possibly add change to this, but the statement is indubitably as true now as it was then. And from a tax perspective, the reduction in the Annual Exemption Allowance (AEA) for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) […]

Read More
Woman climbing on rocky mountains under cloudy sky

What lies beneath?

Compliance , , , , , , , , ,

One of the FCA’s recent publications, Regulation Round Up, contained several interesting articles. Of course, Consumer Duty occupied plenty of space, but one of the articles that didn’t grabbed our attention. This involved censure of a firm and an associated FCA Final Notice issued on 12 May, but it was the numbers that really raised […]

Read More
September 2018 Update

Negative equity – how much of a risk is it?

Compliance , ,

In 1644, English judge Sir Edward Coke was quoted as saying: “For a man’s house is his castle” and this may indeed still be the case, but rising costs and the currently turbulent mortgage market might make securing borrowing easier said than done! In recent weeks the Skipton Building Society broke ranks and offered a […]

Read More
risk

Consumer Duty – adviser charging and risk premium

Compliance , , , , ,

At a recent compliance seminar, there was much discussion about adviser fees in light of the imminent Consumer Duty requirements.   The seminar (not run by ATEB!) covered much of the Consumer Duty ground quite well but the topic of adviser fee scales was not, in our view, entirely on target. See below. Comments from […]

Read More
Value text in frame

The ongoing advice charge conundrum

Compliance , , ,

A high proportion of advice firms operate a largely recurring income model and with this comes the obligation to conduct client reviews. This is a subject that raises its head frequently with firms, especially with Consumer Duty considerations. Reviews are nothing new but when MiFID II came into effect on 3rd January 2018 it introduced […]

Read More
Load More