Having done our first post 1 October reviews of pension transfer cases this week, we spotted a misunderstanding of how the transitional period applies.
Cases we have looked at are still being charged on a contingent basis – all perfectly fine because they satisfied the criteria for the transitional rules …
“Where a firm can demonstrate that clients that have agreed contingent charges terms before 1 October and started work before 1 October, the firm may charge contingently, provided a personal recommendation is given before 1 January 2021 (i.e. within 3 months of the ban being implemented)”
However, the suitability reports did not include the required one-page summary. The firm thought the transitional period applied across the board. It does not. It only applies in relation to the charging basis and the requirement to compare a workplace pension. Other new rules, including the requirement to have a one-page summary and the new CPD requirements for Pension Transfer Specialists, apply as from 1 October.



New Ad-hoc Suitability Review Template
Doug McFarlane Suitability 2022, content management, Mortgage, Pension, Periodic Review, platform, Power of Attorney, Suitability Review, Switch, transfer, Update
We have completed the latest upgrade to ATEB Suitability on 10th November 2022. This update comes at no additional cost and provides various template related enhancements as well as a brand new template designed to assist firms in producing fast and compliant ‘ad-hoc business’ reports/letters outside of annual review. Full details of the enhancements can […]