The FCA seem to be pleased with the way firms have responded to previous RDR Thematic Reviews and the improvements seen in the disclosure of services and charges. However, not to be complacent, they remain concerned that a significant number of firms are still failing to disclose the total cost of ongoing services in cash terms, or not providing an approximation of how long services may take when quoting hourly rates.
As a school report would say ‘still room for improvement’.
They also state that ‘When creating and reviewing information explaining services and charges to consumers, there is scope for firms to further consider its prominence, clarity and accessibility (in addition to compliance with the detailed disclosure rules)’. So, is your disclosure clear and transparent, and are all advisers ensuring that clients fully understand your fees and charges?
The research highlighted the importance that customers place on the ongoing service reviews to ensure investments continue to be appropriate for their circumstances. It is essential therefore that you have a robust and deliverable review process.
The Thematic Review paper can be found here and detail on all three reviews to date here.
Be aware that the FCA has no hesitation in sanctioning firms. Recently, following the thematic reviews, one firm that had not sufficiently engaged with the changes that RDR requires was referred to their Enforcement and Financial Crime Division.



Consumer Duty: It’s a matter of Principle
Huw Reynolds Compliance Conduct, FCA, PI, protection
Apologies for the Consumer Duty overload but unless you’re taking a regulatory sabbatical, this is very much a hot topic. There are in excess of 50 FCA Handbooks (rules and guidance). You cannot be expected to be conversant with all of them, but you should have a good handle on the key ones, such […]