New notification requirement – 25 June 2022

A new notification rule takes effect from 25 June 2022. Read on for details.

 

 

Firms will be aware that it is mandatory to notify the FCA in a number of defined circumstances. The general notification requirements are described in SUP 15. SUP 15.11 describes the detailed notification requirements in relation to breaches of the SM&CR Conduct rules (COCON – or APER the Approved Persons requirements for Appointed Representatives who are not subject to SMCR).

Specifically, a firm must notify the FCA if it takes disciplinary action against certain people working for an SMCR firm and the reason for this action is a reason specified in rules made by the FCA as set out in SUP 15.11.6R.

What is ‘disciplinary action’? 

Disciplinary action against a person is defined for FCA purposes as:

  • the issuing of a formal written warning
  • the suspension or dismissal of that person or
  • the reduction or recovery of any of such person’s remuneration.

Training and competence rules

The TC rules also have something to say on the topic, namely that a firm must:

“… notify the FCA as soon as reasonably practicable after it becomes aware, or has information which reasonably suggests, that any of the following events has occurred or may have occurred in relation to any of its retail investment advisers, and the event is significant: 

  • a retail investment adviser, who has been assessed as competent for the purposes of TC 2.1.1 R, is no longer considered competent for those purposes;
  • a retail investment adviser has failed to attain an appropriate qualification within the time limit prescribed by TC 2.2A.1R (1);
  • a retail investment adviser has failed to comply with APER or COCON (as applicable) in carrying out their controlled function; and
  • a retail investment adviser has performed an activity in TC Appendix 1 before having demonstrated the necessary competence for the purposes of TC 2.1.1 R and without appropriate supervision.”

When considering whether an event is significant a firm should include the following in its considerations:

  • the potential risk of consumer detriment as a result of the event;
  • whether the event or a pattern of events indicate recurrent issues in relation to one or more retail investment advisers; and
  • its obligations under Principle 11.

New rule

A new rule, TC 2.1.31A R is effective as from 25 June 2022. This states:

“Where a firm is required, pursuant to TC 2.1.31R(3), to notify the FCA of a retail investment adviser’s failure to comply with APER or COCON, the firm must also, within the same timeframe, send a similar notification to the accredited body that issued a statement of professional standing in respect of that retail investment adviser.”

But take care …

That all seems pretty straightforward but take care! The items 1, 2 and 4 listed above are uncontroversial as they are factual/assessed – adviser not certified as competent, adviser does not possess a required qualification or adviser acting without competence or supervision. However,  item 3 is less clear.

A quick look at the CII website does not throw up any mention of the requirement to notify the applicable accredited body. CISI do cover it but add to the vagueness of rules by stating:

“From June 2022, the FCA will be requiring firms to report any retail investment advisers’ potential breaches of APER (Approved Persons) and COCON (Code of Conduct) to the relevant accredited bodies. This needs to be done as soon as reasonably practical after firms become aware of or have information, which reasonably suggests that a retail investment adviser has failed to comply with the above. Therefore, the CISI expects the notifications to be made within the same timeframe as these are reported to the FCA.”

The inclusion of the word ‘potential’ suggests that notification is required as soon as there is any suspicion of a breach of conduct rules. However, looking at the definition shown above of ‘disciplinary action’ means that it is not the commencement of a firm’s disciplinary process against an individual that would trigger the notification process but the issuing of a formal written warning, the suspension or dismissal of that person or the reduction or recovery of any of such person’s remuneration.  Each of these can only arise following an investigation into the matter and that investigation must be carried out according to defined standards including HR and employment law considerations. So ‘becomes aware’ or ‘suggests’ and ‘as soon as reasonably practicable’ do not immediately sit with the disciplinary action definition. ‘Failed to comply’ can only be assessed after investigation and not all of those would necessarily lead to ‘the issuing of etc.’  As indicated, the word ‘potential’ just adds to the uncertainty of when a notification is required. CISI members should seek clarification on this from the CISI.

In addition, it is “only if a reason for taking disciplinary action as referred to in section 64C of the Act (Requirement for authorised persons to notify regulator of disciplinary action) is any action, failure to act or circumstance that amounts to a breach of COCON, then the SMCR firm is required to notify the FCA of the disciplinary action”. Disciplinary action that is entirely unrelated to COCON or APER requirements is not covered by these notification requirements.

Furthermore, remember that Conduct Rules only apply to SM&CR individuals referred to in the rules as ‘conduct rules staff’ and not necessarily to all staff.

Tell me once, tell me twice …

The CISI web page also states:

The CISI is required to inform the FCA when it receives a submission of potential breach from a firm, and to keep them updated. Firms are also required to keep the CISI informed of the outcome of any investigations.”

This is absolutely correct and is defined in TC App 6.1. However, it all seems a bit disjointed and unnecessarily convoluted. Firms must notify the regulator, and must also notify the accredited body who, in turn must notify the regulator!

Important Note: ATEB news is intended to provide general information ONLY. The content, including any views expressed or guidance provided, does not replace the need to comply fully with FCA Rules and Guidance. Unless you have discussed news article content with ATEB, and specifically how it relates to your circumstances, then ATEB disclaims all liability and responsibility and actions arising from any reliance placed upon it. For the avoidance of doubt therefore, any reliance you place on such information without our consultation is at your own risk.

ATEB Compliance offers compliance and regulatory advice.

ATEB Suitability provides report writing software for the financial services market.

Our View

What can we say? A rule is a rule even when it is unnecessarily over-engineered. Firms just need to ensure they are aware of what needs to be notified and have processes in place to notify both the FCA and the accredited body.

Action Required By You

For information.
SUIT - Beautiful Reports
CREATE BEAUTIFUL
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
SUIT - Complete Control
TAKE BACK
CONTROL OF YOUR
SUITABILITY REPORT
PRODUCTION
SUIT - Comp confidence
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
WITH FULL
COMPLIANCE
CONFIDENCE
COMP - Hands on
HANDS-ON COMPLIANCE
Helping you to implement solutions
COMP - File checking
FILE CHECKING
All business cases checked, including DB transfers
COMP -166
Section 166 and
Regulatory Reviews
Extensive S166 experience
COMP -healthchecks
Audits and
Health Checks
Need a regulatory check-up?
COMP -166
E-COMPLIANCE
A lighter touch support service
COMP -166
FCA Applications
We have completed hundreds
of Part IV applications
previous arrow
next arrow

About the Author

John is Chartered Financial Planner and a Fellow. With a wealth of financial services experience, including as a successful adviser, John is a long standing ATEB consultant, with a proven track record of delivering robust compliance and T&C solutions across all regulatory disciplines.

Contact Us

Brought to you by

Explore more articles in this category

Other articles that you might be interested in