Important Note
This is a summary of detailed analysis that ATEB has undertaken of the requirements detailed in the MiFID II Policy Statement. Our full analysis will be discussed with ATEB clients as part of our ongoing service arrangements.
This article is one of a series. It is biased towards ‘typical’ ATEB clients. It is a very high-level summary and does not therefore cover every MiFID connotation. It does include our interpretation of the requirements, where there is a lack of clarity, and should therefore be used with discretion and read with a questioning attitude.
All firms should read the Policy Statement.
Accessing the FCA Handbook
We do not replicate FCA rules in this article, but refer to them. The made rules are contained in the annex to the Policy Statement but to access the relevant rules as they will be in their final context, you will need to forward date the FCA handbook. To do this:
- Go to the FCA Handbook;
- Click on ‘Show Timeline’;
- Select a date well into 2018;
- Access the relevant handbook
Independence 1
The FCA will adopt the MiFID II independence standard for personal recommendations to retail clients in relation to MiFID or non-MiFID retail investment products, such as insurance-based investments and personal pensions.
Independent advice is defined as, “a personal recommendation to a client where the personal recommendation provided meets the requirements of the rule on independent advice”. Fair enough, but what does that involve?
Firms offering independent advice must assess a sufficient range of relevant products available on the market. The products must be sufficiently diverse in terms of type and provider to ensure that the client’s investment objectives can be suitably met.
Independent firms cannot limit recommendations to products provided by the firm itself or related entities.
To be independent, the assessment of suitability must include a sufficient range of financial instruments, structured deposits and other retail investment products.
We’ll talk more about ‘financial instruments’ in the next article. Meantime, the specific inclusion of structured deposits is significant and should lead firms, who wish to remain independent, to submit a Structured Deposit Notification to the FCA.
https://www.fca.org.uk/markets/mifid-ii/structured-deposits
The highlighting of a ‘personal recommendation’ within the definition of independent advice is also significant. A change has been made to the Regulated Activities Order (UK legislation) which means that most regulated firms who do not provide a personal recommendation will be exempt from the need to hold the ‘Advising on investments’ permission. The aim here is to provide a clearer distinction between firms providing advice and those merely providing information to clients to make their own financial decisions. We’ll let you decide if that clarity has been achieved.
Of course, those firms involved in making personal recommendations will require the ‘Advising on investments’ permission. A quick check of a firm’s current permissions should provide the necessary reassurance.
Template Enhancement: New ‘Capital Redemption Bond’ Product
Doug McFarlane Suitability 2024, Capital Redemption Bond, content management, PI, Suitability Review, Template Enhancement, Update
We have completed the latest upgrade to ATEB Suitability on 16 September 2024. This update comes at no additional cost and provides various template-related enhancements. Full details of the enhancements can be found below: Suitability Report Template: New ‘Capital Redemption Bond’ product type ‘Capital Redemption Bond’ has been added as a new product type […]