Disclosure of Total, Client Specific, Adviser Charge

FCA rules require adviser charges to be disclosed both generically and specifically. Firms must disclose both:

(a) The generic charging structure (COBS 6.1A.11); and

(b) The client specific total adviser charge payable (COBS 6.1A.24).

The charging structure (a) is exactly that, a structure; think of it like a restaurant menu, which if you like you can order from or if you dislike you can walk away from. We all know that most customers don’t buy financial products in this way, but the FCA believes that this approach promotes competition and protects consumers. (a) is disclosed in ‘up front’ disclosure documents, such as initial disclosure documents, proposition documents or terms of business.

Once you’ve decided to order, you know how much the meal is going to cost, so when you utter those immortal words to the waiter “I’ll have the lobster thermidor if you please my good man“, you’ve effectively entered into a verbal contract which is confirmed by the bill and which should contain no surprises so long as you haven’t forgotten about the second bottle of wine. This is like (b) above, and will typically be disclosed in client specific documents, like fee agreements, engagement letters or client agreements.

The rule requirements for (b) are fairly complex however and it is apparent from research conducted by the FCA that many firms are failing to disclose the client specific total adviser charge correctly.

In accordance with COBS 6.1A.25, a firm may include the information required by the rule on disclosure of total adviser charges (b) in a suitability report. ATEB would urge caution in this respect however and our recommendation is that the total adviser charge be confirmed in the suitability report, but formalised much earlier in the advice process in a separate, additional document. There are numerous reasons for this:

  1. The FCA rule requires the disclosure of (b) ‘as early as practicable’; while this is not defined, we suggest it should be as early as is feasibly possible because it cements the financial agreement between you and the client. If you disclose (b) in the suitability report, you have already undertaken significant work to prepare the recommendation before disclosing the total charge to the client and hence the client may dispute or refuse to agree to the charge.
  2. Although recommended, not all suitability reports will be issued pre-sale. Post sale SRs may not meet the ‘as early as practicable’ requirement.
  3. There are numerous additional and specific requirements for the disclosure of (b) (see COBS 6.1A.24 onwards and the FCA disclosure assessment template below); therefore, a specifically designed document like a fee agreement, will better cater for these requirements.

To be clear therefore, while you should always disclose all fees and charges in the suitability report, to avoid potential non-disclosure and breach of the total adviser charges rule (b), we recommend that a separate and tailored document be used for this purpose, which should be issued early in the advice process.

One final point, the disclosure of fees in (b) should be in cash terms wherever possible. So, if you’ve agreed a fee of 2% for a £100,000 investment, disclose this as £2,000. If you cannot be exact, for example because the fee will depend on the value of investments being switched, then provide accurate examples based on the anticipated value and confirm the exact amount as soon as possible, in writing, post sale.

Important Note: ATEB news is intended to provide general information ONLY. The content, including any views expressed or guidance provided, does not replace the need to comply fully with FCA Rules and Guidance. Unless you have discussed news article content with ATEB, and specifically how it relates to your circumstances, then ATEB disclaims all liability and responsibility and actions arising from any reliance placed upon it. For the avoidance of doubt therefore, any reliance you place on such information without our consultation is at your own risk.

ATEB Compliance offers compliance and regulatory advice.

ATEB Suitability provides report writing software for the financial services market.

Our View

The fee disclosure rules introduced with RDR are a fundamental requirement and there is evidence that firms are failing to understand their obligations in this respect.

Action Required By You

  • Please take time to read and understand COBS 6.1A;
  • Then, use the FCA disclosure assessment template here to objectively assess your standards;
  • If you need assistance, please contact us here.

About the Author

Steve is an ATEB Director and has a deep understanding of all matter regulatory, built up over his 30 years + in the industry. With a training background and a technical brain, he overseas numerous complex projects and client implementation work.

Contact Us

Explore more articles in this category

Other articles that you might be interested in