The FCA seem to be pleased with the way firms have responded to previous RDR Thematic Reviews and the improvements seen in the disclosure of services and charges. However, not to be complacent, they remain concerned that a significant number of firms are still failing to disclose the total cost of ongoing services in cash terms, or not providing an approximation of how long services may take when quoting hourly rates.
As a school report would say ‘still room for improvement’.
They also state that ‘When creating and reviewing information explaining services and charges to consumers, there is scope for firms to further consider its prominence, clarity and accessibility (in addition to compliance with the detailed disclosure rules)’. So, is your disclosure clear and transparent, and are all advisers ensuring that clients fully understand your fees and charges?
The research highlighted the importance that customers place on the ongoing service reviews to ensure investments continue to be appropriate for their circumstances. It is essential therefore that you have a robust and deliverable review process.
The Thematic Review paper can be found here and detail on all three reviews to date here.
Be aware that the FCA has no hesitation in sanctioning firms. Recently, following the thematic reviews, one firm that had not sufficiently engaged with the changes that RDR requires was referred to their Enforcement and Financial Crime Division.
Template Enhancement: New ‘Capital Redemption Bond’ Product
Doug McFarlane Suitability 2024, Capital Redemption Bond, content management, PI, Suitability Review, Template Enhancement, Update
We have completed the latest upgrade to ATEB Suitability on 16 September 2024. This update comes at no additional cost and provides various template-related enhancements. Full details of the enhancements can be found below: Suitability Report Template: New ‘Capital Redemption Bond’ product type ‘Capital Redemption Bond’ has been added as a new product type […]