Menu
Treatment of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)

The term ‘politically exposed persons’ (PEPs) refers to people who hold high public office. The current Money Laundering Regulations require firms to apply extra measures, called “enhanced due diligence” when dealing with those who are PEPs in a state other than the UK, as well as family members or close associates of those PEPs.

The anti-money laundering regime is being updated by 26 June this year and this will include expanding the definition of a PEP to include those holding a politically exposed position in the UK.

This means that more firms will have PEPs.

We do not intend to repeat the guidance here as the paper is relatively brief and well presented. It provides useful instruction, for example how to differentiate between a higher and lower risk PEP, and who is classified as a family member or a close associate.

It is essential reading though, if only to clarify whether or not your firm has PEPs.

You can find the consultation here.

Don’t forget to check Our View about this article and the Actions Required By You

Treatment of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)

Important Note: ATEB news is intended to provide general information ONLY. The content, including any views expressed or guidance provided, does not replace the need to comply fully with FCA Rules and Guidance. Unless you have discussed news article content with ATEB, and specifically how it relates to your circumstances, then ATEB disclaims all liability and responsibility and actions arising from any reliance placed upon it. For the avoidance of doubt therefore, any reliance you place on such information without our consultation is at your own risk.

ATEB Compliance offers compliance and regulatory advice.

ATEB Suitability provides report writing software for the financial services market.

Our View

  • Importantly, the PEP definition is being widened and hence more firms are likely to have such clients.
  • The consultation includes draft guidance. We cannot see the final guidance changing too much from the proposals here.
  • For those firms that have PEPs as clients, or now will have PEPs clients under the expanded definition, this is a must read as it will clarify the anti-money laundering requirements.

Action Required By You

  • Know what constitutes a PEP under the new regulations;
  • Check if you have any PEPs in your client bank;
  • Understand the enhanced due diligence requirements;
  • Ensure that your processes and procedures are up to scratch.
SUIT - Beautiful Reports
CREATE BEAUTIFUL
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
TRY IT FOR FREE
SUIT - Complete Control
TAKE BACK
CONTROL OF YOUR
SUITABILITY REPORT
PRODUCTION
TRY IT FOR FREE
SUIT - Comp confidence
SUITABILITY
REPORTS
WITH FULL
COMPLIANCE
CONFIDENCE
TRY IT FOR FREE
previous arrow
next arrow

About the Author

Contact Us

Brought to you by

Explore more articles in this category

Other articles that you might be interested in

hmrc

Bed and ISA – not so straightforward anymore?

Compliance , ,

Benjamin Franklin once said: “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes”. You could possibly add change to this, but the statement is indubitably as true now as it was then. And from a tax perspective, the reduction in the Annual Exemption Allowance (AEA) for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) […]

Read More
Woman climbing on rocky mountains under cloudy sky

What lies beneath?

Compliance , , , , , , , , ,

One of the FCA’s recent publications, Regulation Round Up, contained several interesting articles. Of course, Consumer Duty occupied plenty of space, but one of the articles that didn’t grabbed our attention. This involved censure of a firm and an associated FCA Final Notice issued on 12 May, but it was the numbers that really raised […]

Read More
September 2018 Update

Negative equity – how much of a risk is it?

Compliance , ,

In 1644, English judge Sir Edward Coke was quoted as saying: “For a man’s house is his castle” and this may indeed still be the case, but rising costs and the currently turbulent mortgage market might make securing borrowing easier said than done! In recent weeks the Skipton Building Society broke ranks and offered a […]

Read More
risk

Consumer Duty – adviser charging and risk premium

Compliance , , , , ,

At a recent compliance seminar, there was much discussion about adviser fees in light of the imminent Consumer Duty requirements.   The seminar (not run by ATEB!) covered much of the Consumer Duty ground quite well but the topic of adviser fee scales was not, in our view, entirely on target. See below. Comments from […]

Read More
Value text in frame

The ongoing advice charge conundrum

Compliance , , ,

A high proportion of advice firms operate a largely recurring income model and with this comes the obligation to conduct client reviews. This is a subject that raises its head frequently with firms, especially with Consumer Duty considerations. Reviews are nothing new but when MiFID II came into effect on 3rd January 2018 it introduced […]

Read More
Load More